Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Chesterton loved paradoxes. He could turn phrases and ideas like normal people roll ice around on their tongues. Part poet, part jester, he was like a five year old wielding a broad sword. The problem with paradoxes is that they never encompass the truth, they only get us to look at it in different ways. At best they're tools for dismantling functional fixedness, at worst they're smokescreens for bad arguments. Chesterton knew this, but he often got carried away. It's a shame too, because he makes some damn fine arguments and exposes a lot of nonsense considered foundational to modern thought by using paradoxes. But alas style is not content and artifice is not architecture. To put it punctiliously. .. . paradoxically it was his paradoxes that cost him the respect that his ideas deserved (wink). Still, I think he stands as one of the great thinkers of the modern age and points a way through for Christians to think about the present intellectual climate we inhabit.

"Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions."
"To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."
"Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about."

-----G.K. Chesterton

Sunday, November 27, 2005

"All of those things for which we have no words are lost. The mind--the culture-- has two little tools, grammar and lexicon: a decorated sand bucket and a matching shovel. With these we bluster about the continents and do all the world's work. With these we try to save our very lives."

-----Annie Dillard, "Teaching a Stone to Talk"

Saturday, November 19, 2005

"A dogmatic belief in objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny or an obedience which is not slavery."

-----C.S. Lewis, "The Abolition of Man"

Discuss. . . .

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

What's really concerning to me about this country right now is our collective ability to have the wool pulled over our eyes due to our intellectual apathy and our willingness to let one or two key issues color every other issue. Particularly, I'm upset about the war in Iraq and the judicial nomination process. But what's most disconcerting is how moderate Republican and Democrat leaders alike keep getting played by this neo-conservative administration.

Let's not talk about all the lies and mistakes besmearing our name and reputation in Iraq, let's talk about leadership and patriotism. Let's not talk about judges with frighteningly narrow views of the constitution--judges who want to erradicate equality programs--rather let's talk about abortion. Both times the bait and switch. Why? Because hardly anyone is taking the time to do the hard work of trying to see through the smoke, or more ominously, no one gives shit because they're so tired of being lied to over and over again by nearly everyone in power.

I personally prefer to think of it more along the lines that Huxley articulated when he prophesied that we'll become "too busy with the orgy-porgy and the bumblepuppy" to care. It's what entertains us that kills us, and those in power know it all too well. Just appeal to a few hot button sentiments and no one will ever know the wiser. The average citizen can't be bothered with the truth when his faith only boils down to pro-life, or worse yet when the most pressing thing she has to know is what's gonna happen next on "Lost." Lost indeed!

It's frightening because the only way this country is going to change is if the people collectively stand up and call the leaders to task, hold them accountable, and we can't do that when most of us are sucking our thumbs in front of the TV instead of kneeling in the house of the Lord.

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

"When I look at the cross of Christ, what I see up there is all my shit and everybody else's. So I ask myself a question a lot of people have asked: Who is this man? And was He who He said He was, or was He just a religious nut? And there it is, and that's the question. And no one can talk you into it or out of it.....But there are two routes out of town. There always are. There's transcendence and there's the cover version, or the dull copy: junk food transcendence of drugs, the 'easy to digest but finally that's gonna give you heart disease' religion. But I tend to believe that people who just want a cheap way out of their life can find zealotry in lots of places. The true life of a believer is one of a longer, more hazardous or uphill pilgrimage, and where you uncover slowly the sort of illumination for your next step. Religious people, generally, they freak me out. Honestly, I start twitching when I'm around them. But sometimes, maybe weirdos are the only people who really know they need God."

-----Bono, from "Bono: In Conversation with Michka Assayas"